There are some factual things I would say are wrong about this court case being the determining factor of Alberta pulling back on restrictions. Certainly, public pressure is one of reasons, but only through massive public pressure from people will anything make a difference. In case I misinterpreted Patrick as taking credit for Alberta’s recent dial back on restrictions, this was not simply the case of this court case.
All credit to any success we have is due to each and every Canadian doing their part. Keep up the great work! They are starting to cave, but we must mot stop, or even think that these rollbacks are permanent. they have an agenda, and we know what it is. We don’t stop until they are all resigned, and then prosecuted.
I am an extremely concerned citizen about the direction our politicians wish to take us, UNLAWFULLY, against our wishes. The evidence, lying and censoring the truth about covid 19 is at an all time high.
I am not a doctor, or scientist. Nor do I need to be. There is massive censorship of these professionals funded by big pharma to silence them from exposing the truth. On this site, I have documented their videos, along with lawyers all over the world. There are multiple law suits in Canada against the Federal and Provincial governments for their actions regarding Covid 19. The cases and lawyers are well documented on this site, and you can find them under the Awake Resources tab.
The research is accumulated through thousands of our members, some of which are police, doctors, chiropractors, immunologists, and harvard educated people. We are not anti-vaxxers, nor conspiracy theorists. We are citizens that are determined to expose the truth. The mainstream media on this planet is owned by 6 large companies. The rest are subsidiaries, and all of them are being given directives to suppress anything against the narrative of lockdowns, and vaccines. There is a political agenda in play here, and our governments have turned against their people.
They are using software, and mail in ballots to keep their political figures in office to complete this agenda. We are all being played on a massive level, and by investigating the material on this site and thousands of other sites that popped up trying to share the truth with you, our goal is simply this.
To save our Country from totalitarianism and to save our citizens from medical tyranny from corrupt organizations such as the WHO, and the CDC. These companies are now just vaccine companies owned by the medical cartel we are all falling victim too. This is a wake up call to humanity, our police, military, and citizens to take back our country and expose the criminals, and to hold them accountable in trials for war crimes against humanity.
WE WILL WIN PEOPLE! STAY STRONG. STAY FOCUSED. NEVER STOP SPREADING THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL!!
I resigned from violating my oath to uphold the US constitution
Kudos to you.
Good morning, Thanks for posting Now, we have ammo to put Local and State governments on Notice. But, the commie Dems are not used to be challenged.
Patrick I was just told at work that they are going to make the jab manditory. Will the prosses that you used on the state work with a company.
No one at a workplace can do this. Stand up for your rights, and let them know they will pay your salary for the rest of your life via a lawsuit if they try and do this.
This bs they are pulling has me mad as hell. I know people personally that cannot afford not to work or to pay a lawyer & have been put on notice with this jab. Now I wish I’d have gone to school to be a lawyer instead of a nurse bc I’d be using my skill to help these people. Thank you for fighting & standing up to these tyrants.
Thank you Donna! We support all you health care workers that are awake and being put in terrible situation! We do our best to put out credible information in the hopes people will wake up and STAND UP against tyranny.
There is on Action4Canada website a letter of liability for employer. Look under the tab for legal or covid. I would get yourself a lawyer to give your case more credence and advice you on your human rights or go it alone. It would help if you had other employees with you so they could all present their own letter of liability. Someone suggested this approach –
If you are being forced to vaccinate in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it.
The secret is NOT to refuse it but rather ask for information and reassurance as follows:
‘I write with regard to the matter of requiring a covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.
I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:
1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
2 Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?
5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?
6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any durees from ourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?
7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?
Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:
1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and /or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.
The point is, that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused.
Ester Jackson, please permit me to suggest a few questions that I think may test the ethical basis of the trials.
The sponsors of the trial in Canada include those institutions or organizations or other entities that have a financial interest or patent interest in the product. Please list all of the sponsors.
The safety oversight group of each trial is usually comprised of independent experts in their fields; they must truthfully declare that they no conflicts of interest with the product or its sponsors. Please list the members of the oversight group for each product undergoing trial as a Covid vaccine.
What are the criteria for stopping a product trial in terms of adverse effects and deaths or other severe outcomes? For instance, how many deaths that are related temporally to the shot will be deemed too many? Will autopsies be performed for each death?
Please provide the complete definition of vaccine for the purposes of these trials. Does this definition vary from previous vaccine trials?
Please answer yes or no to the follow questions for each product under trial. Is the product designed to prevent infection? Is the product designed to prevent transmission? Is the product designed to subdue symptoms and if, yes, please list each symptom. Compared to natural immunity gained through previous infection, what is the additional benefit, if any, the is measurable and is the designed benefit?
Please describe each method that will be used to test individuals prior to taking the shot to determine their prior infection status. Please describe each method that will be used to monitor the production of the spike protein and its travel and residency within the body of each individual who has volunteered for the product trial.
Please identify the basis for promoting each product as safe for people under the age of 30, under the age of 18, under the age of 12, and unborn. Please state the baseline risk of infection, prior to the shot, for each age cohort listed above. Please describe the measurable benefit in reduction of baseline risk for each age cohort and the methods by which this will be measured; and describe the target of quantifiable reduction in baseline risk.
Hiring a lawyer will be the death jab I would not if you care to win that is. I suggest you start following Chris at awarriorcalls.com subscribe and get in on the live streams every Monday next Monday begging the biggest broadcast yet very important so watch and share the hell out of it as I and many others believe that the solution he is working on is the only game in town that will once and for all end this and many other things.
This is the transcript for just the first part of the trial, am I right? Please post the follow-up when it becomes available. Thank you.
The Nuremberg Codes say it very clearly: people have to volunteer to partake in medical experiments, which this vaccine is!!
Theory: 5G power station called Delta and the in your body lead graphite jab and the
Delta variant issue
https://www.ournewearthnews.com/2021/07/09/5g-illuminati-delta-variant-connection-you-have-to-see-now-before-its-too-late/
ALL LEGAL DOCUMENTS TO SUBMIT TO UNIVERSITY / SCHOOL AND PLACE OF WORK ARE FOUND ON THIS SITE – MAKE THEM SIGN THE DOCUMENT – LEGALLY MAKE THEM LIABLE FOR ANY AND ALL EXPENSES SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF TAKING THE EXPERIMENTAL COVID SHOT – THEY WILL BACK DOWN – THEY WILL NOT SIGN THIS – THEY WILL NOT REQUIRE YOU TO GET THE SHOT – you can find those documents at – – Using Disaster Capitalism to Control All Humans – Catherine Austin Fitts
By Greg Hunter On July 3, 2021 https://usawatchdog.com/using-disaster-capitalism-to-control-all-humans-catherine-austin-fitts/
Thank you for the resource.
Hi Robert,
The link you’ve provided appears to apply to the US and UK only. For some reason, I don’t see the Canadian version. Just need to make sure I have the correct form. My work is ok, the jab is not mandatory. But my wife’s suddenly is. Well, they say it may affect her going back to the office. She is currently working from home, but they are planning to go back to the office in September.
Thanks.
Go to Action4Canada to find a letter of liability for employer (under the legal or covid tab) and there is one for the school/school board to cover children. The goal is not to refuse and not to quit.
As well as the letter someone suggested this –
If you are being forced to vaccinate in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it.
The secret is NOT to refuse it but rather ask for information and reassurance as follows:
‘I write with regard to the matter of requiring a covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.
I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:
1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
2 Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?
5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?
6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any durees from ourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?
7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?
Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:
1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and /or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.
The point is, that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused.
Make sure you have a copy of the Nuremberg Code
Brilliant argument. Thanks for the update.
Please provide a link to the documents for this Canadian court case that it might be shared to others.
It is already on this page. You need to read the page as well as watch the video.
Well, I have to say, they do a great job of hiding the transcript. I’m pretty good at finding cases and documentation, but this site and Mr. King both won the ‘hide the transcript’ game!
The case documents AND now the transcript should be in a big box at the top of the page — that way you will stop turning off visitors who have better things to do than play ‘hide and seek’.
I won’t be back.
The words here is the transcript file was not enough to figure out to click on that heading? Ok, I will make it blue for other people that have 0 patience. No loss to me if you don’t come back because of something like this. Your pregorative. That is what a free society is about. Thanks for your input.
This is the transcript for the first part of the trial only – May 4.
Do you have the transcript for July 24? This is where the important material is
Are you not reading or were you in a hurry? The transcript it right there. I just downloaded it. My goodness, what a speech you give just because you can’t be bothered to look. You got issue.
I’ve read through the transcript and cannot find any testimony indicating a failure on the part of the “Crown” to provide proof the virus exists. What am I missing?
Thats how I read it too, and thats why I said, whats going on with all this hype? This is not to knock Patrick and maybe I too, am missing something. However, all fights in court, and out of court by freedom fighters make them all friends of mine. This post was not to knock Pat, but more to say, I think it is the pressure FROM ALL CANADIANS in this fight, and in Alberta that pushed them back. Or it could even be part of their plan. There is nothing we can take for granted, and there is no celebration in my mind, until our health ministers at the very least are behind bars, and this is fully revealed on idiot mainstream media for everyone to know we were not making this shit up.
Is this really the full transcript? I cannot find the transcript on either Dan Dicks site or Stew Peters site.
In his interview with Dan Dicks and Stew Peters, Patrick was emphatic about the court repeating and recording (i.e. stenographers) the statement that the virus had not been isolated PLUS the point that the judge was fullly apologetic to Patrick. Both are glaring omissions from the transcript you have provided. if this is the full transcript then it will immediately raise a number of “pertinent” questions.
Ian
Montreal
Apparently, there is a second transcript that has not been released.
Same. This seems to be from May of 2021 before the subpoena was submitted for Deena Hinshaw. King was scheduled to go back to court on July 19, 2021. Those are the transcripts that would have them admitting they have no evidence. These transcripts are all about the ticket.
COURT is a playing field with referees or umpires to play the game fairly. However the courts we use to for arguments are rigged as they are controlled by those that rule us.As why this fake world wide pandemic. You really think they will help? Put it together it’s simple. They use fictitious conveyance of grammar to win what ever they want to win. They will move the goal posts and let a few scores in to keep the illusion going. The B.A.R society is part of the problem,Why is it that no one from the smart liars/lawyers shutting this down ASAP.? Why continuing this narrative? Even judges why are they making it so difficult to get this over right away? None of this makes any sense. The judicial cyst em world wide should be welcoming to shut this down as with government.They are all in on it. Learn syntax and get out of the birth/berth certificate fiction bull shit they have us under. Real eyes they have us under their spell with their spelling/grammar. Like math you always get the same right answer but there language you can be easily wrong as the correctness is not there in this legal nightmare. Good luck with those paid off referees.
/
/
Good concerns raised there.
The judge described the procedings as criminal-like or somesuch. If that is so, then, where are the criminal defence lawyers that the courts provide to people who have no represenation? Or is there some big hurdle to qualify?
I realize that when PATRICK took this one, back when there were no laywers stepping forward and no fight the fines fundraising, he probablly felt he had to go it alone. Right now, I think he could get a lawyer and make this a constitutional case from which his lawyer could be compensated by the losing government side. Sure some amount needs to be provided upfront, but that can be got.
Why post all this without knowing the full datasets from the second trial?
Hey David, my mother was handed out a face mask fine back in March of this year. She is a 75 year old senior citizen that has had asthma for over thirty years and can not wear the regular cloth masks for this reason. Upon entering a Walmart in northern B.C. she was approached by an RCMP member and told that her face shield style mask was not covering her face and mouth and that she could not wear it without putting a cloth mask underneath it. My mother is of Portuguese decent and has a hard time communicating in english, especially when under stress. She had never had a problem wearing this style mask through the entire pandemic and had no idea that she would be harassed by the RCMP for wearing one. When she told the cop that she had a respiratory condition, he totally ignored what she said and he did not ask for proof of her medical exemption but simply asked her for her drivers license, wrote her a ticket for $230 and then handed it to her and walked away without explaining anything else to her! She was very traumatized by the interaction and could not understand why she was treated so disrespectfully. We filed a complaint against that police officer to no avail and it was decided that the officer did no wrong and and so my mother was given a court date in October. I am now working on filing a ‘Request for Review form’ to submit to the CRCC (Civilian Review and Complaints Commission) to appeal this decision but need some help. Do you know if these ‘Emergency Act Laws’ can actually be enforced and whether or not these fines actually need to be paid legally? If you could direct me to any sources of information concerning this topic it would be greatly appreciated. From what I remember reading last year, these Emergency Act recommendations are not actual Provincial laws and cannot be enforced as such? We want to set an example by fighting this to the bitter end to put a spot light on this chicken shit cop who had absolutely no respect or compassion for my mother and simply wanted to make his quota on tickets at the expense of a senior citizen on a fixed income. We feel that she may have also been racially profiled and discriminated against because of her accent and inability to speak fluent english. Any help you can provide will be very appreciated. Thank you.
Mabuhay!
Where can I find the rest of the court transcripts?
Thanks David for your great info
Christine Massey made Freedom of Information request to the Canadian Government requesting a pure isolate SARSCov2 virus from a positive Covid patient and the response was “Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request. The complete letter from health Canada/Sante Canada is on file https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Health-Canada-FinalResponse-A-2020-00208-2020-06-13.pdf
The Irish Government also admits it is not able to supply a pure isolate SARSCov2 virus.
If you go to http://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download – Pg 42 you will read that since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession:MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/ul)spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VIM) to mimic clinical specimen.
Pg 40 you will read the test cannot distinguish between bacteria or virus
David, he did admit right in his video that he did not win in court and he said why and said he would be going back to court. I guess the important thing here is probably that they may have said that they didn’t have the evidence. In any case yes, he did go , he did fight and he did stand up which I applaud. There have been many even professionals now that have said there is no evidence, the California university that looked at the 1500 pos tests tried to get a sample from CDC to compare as they had come up with influenza A and influenza B but nothing else. CDC said then they had no human sample. I think that the timing of his court case and the back down of Alberta was maybe a little to exciting for it all. I applaud Patrick for what he has done thus far. Thank you David for saying what you did and not putting him down but just a simple explanation. May we all stick together and be united.
Thank you for providing this. I really appreciate it. Are there transcripts from the July 19, 2021 case?
Not yet
He went back to court either July 19th or the 24th.
Who cares HOW he did it?? This is groundbreaking. Understanding that MANY have gone before him, these documents, which he procured are priceless for many, the world over. ALL Patriots should be celebrating, not worrying about who takes credit for it…
These are not the complete court transcripts to document the whole story presented. It only reads up to the adjournment for Patrick to subpoena Deena Hinshaw. I would like to share the story, but need the full documentation to Corroborate the full story presented.
So we’re still looking for a release of the July hearing transcript to (hopefully) corroborate Patrick’s claims about what was said in the courtroom? The May 4th transcript is cool and all, but it has limited relevance to part of the story that got us all fired up.
I work for CN rail as a contractor, which means I’m in a Federal regulated industry. Trudeau is planning on making this covid jab mandatory for federal workers and industry. Myself with many more.of us, refuse to get the jab and wondering if there is any legal forms that I can send off to the regional supervisor, that may make them back off, I know CN rail will not want a labour shortage but Trudeau will be happy to force this jab on everyone.
I will be getting the Ontario Government exemption but CN rail is federal jurisdiction so it may not be good enough.
Thanks so much for any direction and help.
There are ways to put CN on notice. But one way to proceed is to show up and start unloading your crew and gear and if CN asks for vax info stop and tell them you will packup your crew and gear if that is going to be a problem for CN. At that moment they are likely to back down and try to come to some sort of an understanding, such as creating a bubble for your crew or something like that.
Have seen it done over masking and testing and quarentining. Companies need you when they need you and so contractors have a pretty good card to play. Going forward from that you have a clear precedent that you woud have made work so you can keep your crew employed and your business afloat. But without complying.
Could you, please, point out the very spot/line where Patrick gets Deena’s acknowledgement that there is NO basic, or NO MATRIAL uynderlying the “public” health order.
Thank you!
I can’t. Because I did not see this in the transcript.
Please where is the document you cited a couple days ago on FB from the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General, BC ministerial order No M275. I could not find it on the gov website. It would be very kind of you to give me the link. Use the email address below.
Use the search on our site.
Hello,
I searched your site for that document back and forth, no luck. Why not just give me the link. No, I am not a troll, just a concerned citizen from Alberta. Stories like this ought to be front and center on any news outlet.
Just typing in BC found the post. i don’t mind helping, but you have to understand, I get 100’s of emails per day, hundreds of social media enquiries. I really don’t have the time to look everytime someone asks me to find something for them that I have posted. If I posted it, it is on here. There is a search form, and i just typed BC revoked, and found it right away.
https://awakecanada.org/stage-3-of-reopening-act-is-a-blatant-lie/
Thank you, I truly appreciate your effort and help. People like you in those times of need are invaluable.
Does anybody has the rest of the case transcripts ? this is only the first sittings and does not show his victory on tribunal
Patrick, I am trying to file something in the state of Nevada here in the United States. I’d like to specifically see exactly the filings and everything that you did. I want to go after the vaccine and the mask mandate. But mainly the mask mandate. But I want to be prepared to go after the vaccine piece here watching what’s happening in Australia I can only imagine they’re going to try to pull that crap in Canada at the USA and everywhere for that matter. Please shoot me an email. I will get you my cell phone number whatever you need to help me get this rolling. Thanks
Craig
Cheers for the link to the transcript. For me Patricks interview with Stew Peters was more about no evidence of a virus being isolated. That to me is now the evidence that can be used to knock out the giants!
Yes, agreed. I did not have the second transcript when I made this.
This is all bs. No one can provide the specific evidence he requested because it goes against scientific facts that have existed for 100 years. Isolating a virus in the way that KIng wants evidence for is not possible and never has been. Viruses, unlike bacteria, must be isolated within the cell where it exists.
I would like the information that Patrick king has.