There is no asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19, therefore there is no reason for people without symptoms to wear masks.
The article is posted here:
https://www.aier.org/article/masking-a-careful-review-of-the-evidence/
It says:
Asymptomatic spread and masks?
Before proceeding to the key evidence on the effectiveness (or not) of face coverings (masks), we wish to highlight research that is highly applicable. This surrounds recently emerging evidence that Covid-19 spread is so exceedingly rare in asymptomatic persons as to have virtually no impact in the grand scheme. Given that there are very strong data to support this contention, then we state at the outset that universal masking has no merit and cannot be supported by reliable data or research.
In an article published in Nature Communications (November 2020) that studied 10 million eligible persons, it was demonstrated that asymptomatic spread was not merely rare but in fact, does not appear to happen at all! Not one instance was found in the study whereby researchers reported that there were positive tests emerging even amongst close contacts of asymptomatic cases in this sample of 10 million. Why would we even consider then the need for universal masking when there is evidence like this of limited asymptomatic spread?
We also point out (and we also recognize and appreciate that this argument is far from being one based in strong evidence per se) that if ten’s of studies or more are required to prove, one way or another, whether a procedure is effective or not (and to therefore lead to changes in standard of care), and there are still no reliable data, the effects are either minimal or nonexistent. Hence it can be reasoned that there is no meaningful effect in the first place; such an argument can be used for the masking dilemma.
All this is to say that there is and was no scientific justification to mandate or call for ‘voluntary’ masking of healthy people. None! And we also suggest that this straightforward reasoning can be applied to most of the other ‘mitigation’ efforts being implemented to date; specifically societal lockdowns, and school closures. In fact, we can find no definitive research-based evidence to support masking, societal lockdowns, or school closures at the time of writing this piece. We continue to argue that most of this has been arbitrarily construed by the government leaders and their medical experts.
These policies are not merely misguided, but they are also not without serious and adverse consequences; they have caused crushing harms and have been very injurious at a personal and societal level. Restrictive policies have not been thought through as to the implications at large! The benefits have not been assessed or considered alongside the potential (and documented) harms and this is a catastrophic omission from the perspective of sound public health policy and principles. In short, the bureaucracy has provided us with confused and often contradictory policy supported by a lack of clarity, sheer assumptions, and nonsense in general, and in this case, in relation to universal masking. Our leadership and ‘experts’ have failed to recognize the crushing harms that result from their arbitrary and even worse, capricious policies that lack any reliable evidentiary support!
It might also be expected that in light of the apparent groundbreaking seminal research to which we alluded above, this would not only be covered widely by the mainstream media and of course our experts but that this would clarify and help settle issues pertaining to asymptomatic spread, lockdowns in general, school closures, and of course in this case, masking. Amazingly though, there has been no acknowledgement of this work. And yet such findings that could bear on evidence-informed decision-making were ignored entirely.
___
Contributing Authors to the article:
Paul E Alexander MSc PhD, McMaster University and GUIDE Research Methods Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada elias98_99@yahoo.com
Howard C. Tenenbaum DDS, Dip. Perio., PhD, FRCD(C) Centre for Advanced Dental Research and Care, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Ramin Oskoui, MD, CEO, Foxhall Cardiology, PC, Washington, DC oskouimd@gmail.com
Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA harvey.risch@yale.edu
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA peteramccullough@gmail.com
Nicholas E. Alexander
Excellent article and awaiting a class action by the people for the.people. there are 2 cases presented, Crimes Againgst Humanity and negligence charges against Premiers, health officials or so they call themselves, I believe. When **** hits the fan, watch out and I can’t wait. Thanks
There are not good police or military if they follow immoral illegal orders. Following orders which are illegal and immoral is the definition of immoral people.
I belive there are good people out bothered that Fear for there livelihoods in the face of this and it is only through fear of this that they let this go on. That only means they are weak not immoral. Its time to stand up, all of us and say no. This won’t happen overnight but it will if continue to press.
Hell>o
We the people; let it be known.
The way forward together
The year 1901,.With Queen Victoria’s death, the repeal of section 2 of the British North America Act came into force. Deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of section 2.has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria.
We the people, deceived by corporations.
1931 Canada rejected the opportunity to federate and create a new constitution. WHY Follow the money….to learn how certain forces active today, were determined not to surrender their cherished positions of power. “Over we the people!” These forces kept alive the illusion of “Canadian Confederation” and “Sovereignty”. Gov. Generals Lt. Governors, and Queen of Canada are simply fictional figure heads with NO standing in law.
1982 “Canada act” a “patriate” of the defunct BNA Act of 1867 “the deception of a new constitution”.
This British Parliament act of a foreign parliament could not become Supreme Law (Law of the sea) here on the land mass commonly known as Canada.
The Magna Carta – “Great Charter” is an 800 year old document from Europe’s Middle Ages, yet surprisingly it still has relevance in common law today.
“TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all God’s liberties, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:”
So regardless of what the Corporations that pose as Our governments say, there is no provision in the Magna Carta for the introduction of a Parliament with any power to create, modify or overturn any law in of or the Magna Carta itself. In short Magna Carta cannot be removed, repealed, replaced, or changed without the consent of the People as it was set as a treaty for the people, can only be undone by the people. Magna Carta has been used as the basis of Constitutional Law around the world for centuries and remains an Important protection of the People’s Right to Freedom and the People’s Right to fight against Tyranny and Oppression.
The Sovereign Basis of Common Law Courts
The Commons of England assembled in Parliament declare that the people under God are the origin of all just power and have the supreme authority of the nation. Whatsoever is enacted and declared law by the Commons alone has the force of law, and all the people are included thereby, with or without the consent of the king. Such an Assembly in England, known as the Commons or Parliament, created the High Court of Justice that lawfully deposed and executed King Charles I in 1649 as a tyrant and war criminal. For ultimately all legal power derives from a Constitution established by free men and women gathered as equal sovereigns under God and the natural law. If our courts do not have such a sanction they are merely a private weapon in the hands of a few, and thereby they mimic the autocracy of de-facto rulers. Where does their authority come from? Who is liable for crimes against humanity?
First; Common law; WE THE PEOPLE, RIGHTS, first and foremost.
Second; No mention of any special, supremacy to or for corporations!
Third; The elected persons; that make up the parliament / legislature, no matter what party, are responsible to ——we the people (man or woman).
The parliamentary assembly has created an illusion by deception of being supreme, over we the people!
The very purpose of this elected corporate assembly as mentioned above, has become,
A FAILURE TO HONESTY! LET IT BE KNOWN WE THE PEOPLE—- KNOW.
To fix where we are going; first we have to hold accountable the corrupt people of the present.
Note; we the people have been deceived by the words “Crown” , “legal”, and “Corporations” in Canada!
Deceived at registration / birth certificate; a man or women the name always appears in all (CAPITAL LETTERS) meaning registered to the federal corporations of Canada. Within the federal corporations we the people become pawns within those deceptive corporations. Where the person becomes Government documented as cargo with a bill of lading (your birth certificate) on a ship under their maritime legal system.
1) The name/s your parents gave you, is your real individual names as a man or woman in lower case letters! under law of the land !
2) Your family name given by a Government in all CAPITAL LETTERS is a Bill of lading under the maritime legal system.
3) All PERSONS and their CAPITALIZED FAMILY NAME are a commodity for monetary exchange, by Government on the stock market! We will claim our exceptions!
All People are now PERSONS under the Corporation, All persons are chattel (a piece of property that is moveable).
Which ultimately is property trespass against all people by the federal corporations of Canada.
Offenders; the corrupt justice corporations that use a “legal system of the water” against we the man and women of Canada, having been caused harm, and trespassed upon by these deceptive corporations.
Categorical law ; L- land, A- air, W- water.
1) L – land– God’s common Laws and charters of rights and freedoms of we the people on the L-land.
(equal judgement, cause no harm to man or women)
a ) Common law is to pursue; man or women that caused harm to property by trespass.
Property trespass on or to another man or women body, property without cause.
b) no person is outside the law of the land!
2) W-water—Corporate maritime legal system; is corrupt and deceptive. Used by deceivers to deceive.
Today Canada is not a lawfully established sovereign nation; due to the ratification failure of the last, 1987 Charlotte town accord.
a ) Use of maritime Legal codes as an umbrella to protect those connected to the
Canadian; de-facto government service corporation. —-The myth is Canada —
Note; Corporate Governments legal systems, is independent of we the people laws of the land..
Court of precedence is the use of the maritime legal system and meant to deceive the use of law on or of the land
Never pursue the corporation in legal action. Pursue the man or women of the corporation with common law, the person that does harm to body, property by trespass. Example. fraud, crimes against humanity!
The way forward; is people held accountable, using common law of the land, through the use of we
the peoples public court house on the land!
This has been forwarded to all B.C Parl. members!
regards
gordon
The Nuremberg Code
The text of the Nuremberg Code
I will post it, tomorrow. I have posted it multiple times on social media, because it is being violated at a massive level.
This is a distraction for the agenda of The Great Reset so the 1% control all of us.
It’s divide and conquer, and we are being pitted against each other!
We are being told to “pick a side: jab vs unjabbed, black vs white, women vs men, etc”. But really, all we need to do is choose Good over Evil.
Everyone needs to realize we are being played, manipulated, etc. Those of us who are awake need to help people understand the polarization that is occurring and how dangerous it is. We need to come together asap!
BOUNTY SEEKERS NEEDED to capture these criminals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-rXXHK3d4A
Brilliant, we’ve shared this here, thank you … https://thecanadianreport.ca/category/health/
Let’s assume some validity to the infection stats. Meaning that there are quite a lot of people who are infected. When I go out into social situations I NEVER see anyone coughing or exhibiting any symptoms. So if Asymptomatic people cannot transmit where is all the transmission coming from? Do you see the problem? If there are no symptomatic people around here should be no spread. If the virus is spreading it means there must be Asymptomatic spread.
How do you know the virus is spreading? From the news about cases? The cases have no merit, they are substantiated on false positive pcr tests that just recently had their EAU revoked as of December 31, 2020. They will now move to other tests that ALSO produce false positives. There is no pandemic. There is only propaganda to get us to comply with the changes they want to make to our society that gives government totalitarian control over the population.