Let’s End The Climate Change Narrative Fraud

Let’s End The Climate Change Narrative Fraud2026-02-18T09:51:50-08:00

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in.  This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In the future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

Download Climate Change Apps & Share The Real Science on Climate Change Not Funded By Governments & Propagandists.  The apps are free.

For Iphone

Larry Fink the founder of Google is one of the globalists, pushing for world dominance pushing the climate change narrative that has removed the app from the Google play store.  However, you can still download the app here, and just choose to allow your android device to allow apps from unidentified publishers.  There is no malicious files in this app, only 60 slides that sum up the whole climate change narrative lie.  You will get warnings on it not being safe, but this is normal for any app downloaded from outside the play store, in which information like this is being censored.

For Android

Conveniently, once you have downloaded the app, share the individual slides to your favourite social media device.

There is no climate emergency

A global network of over 1900 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Warming is far slower than predicted

The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with COis beneficial.

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters

There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment.

Epilogue

The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world*. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change.

From now onward the group is going to function as “Global Climate Intelligence Group”. The CLINTEL Group will give solicited and unsolicited advice on climate change and energy transition to governments and companies worldwide.

It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts

World Climate Declaration plus all signatories in pdf

World Climate Declaration AMBASSADORS

NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR JOHN F. CLAUSER / USA
PROFESSOR GUUS BERKHOUT / THE NETHERLANDS
DR. CORNELIS LE PAIR / THE NETHERLANDS
PROFESSOR REYNALD DU BERGER / FRENCH SPEAKING CANADA
BARRY BRILL / NEW ZEALAND
DR. PATRICK MOORE / ENGLISH SPEAKING CANADA
JENS MORTON HANSEN / DENMARK
PROFESSOR LÁSZIÓ SZARKA / HUNGARY
PROFESSOR SEOK SOON PARK / SOUTH KOREA
PROFESSOR JAN-ERIK SOLHEIM / NORWAY
DR. G.-FIVOS SARGENTIS / GREECE
FERDINAND MEEUS / DUTCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR RICHARD LINDZEN / USA
HENRI A. MASSON / FRENCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR INGEMAR NORDIN / SWEDEN
JIM O’BRIEN / REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
PROFESSOR IAN PLIMER / AUSTRALIA
DOUGLAS POLLOCK / CHILE
DR. PETER STALLINGA / PORTUGAL
DR. BLANCA PARGA LANDA / SPAIN
PROFESSOR ALBERTO PRESTININZI / ITALY
PROFESSOR BENOÎT RITTAUD / FRANCE
DR. THIAGO MAIA / BRAZIL
PROFESSOR FRITZ VAHRENHOLT / GERMANY
THE VISCOUNT MONCKTON OF BRENCHLEY / UNITED KINGDOM
DUŠAN BIŽIĆ / CROATIA, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, SERBIA AND MONTE NEGRO

In addition to these ambassadors, there are over 1900 scientists that have joined our organization and declare that there is no climate change emergency, and instead this is a paid and funded narrative by governments over the world looking to implement green policies to fatten their wallets, and control the populations.   Be free people.  You can care about the planet, live green, reduce population, but undestand one thing.  Humans are not causing the climate to change.   Now if you want to advocate for better polution policies, your governments are all guilty of incompetence, corruption, and bias bought and paid for by their corporate lobbyists.  Yes we can do better on taking care of our planet, but nothing we are doing, is causing climate change, and CO2 has been shown in history to be 5 times the level it is right now, and the planet was flourishing. CO2 is the food for all life on our planet.

Read Our Posts to Learn More

Le président de Clintel, Václav Klaus, met en garde : « Aucun changement radical ne sera observé en Europe dans un avenir proche.»

Un optimisme naïf sur la politique climatique en surestimant les récents signaux positifs, comme ceux du président Trump serait une érreur. C'est l'avis de Václav Klaus, président de Clintel : « Rien n'a changé au sein de l'UE. En tant que spécialistes des sciences sociales, on ne voit pas de changement radical se produire en Europe dans un avenir proche. » a dit M. Klaus a lors de la réunion annuelle de l'Association norvégienne des climatologues (Klimarealistene) à Oslo, le 15 mars. The post Le président de Clintel, Václav Klaus, met en garde : « Aucun changement radical ne sera observé en Europe dans un avenir proche.» appeared first on Clintel.

By |17 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Eine bahnbrechende neue Studie stellt die Grundlagen von Klimawandel-Bewertungen infrage und deckt gravierende Mängel bei der Messung des Wärmeinhalts der Ozeane auf

Ein internationales Team weist nach, dass der wichtigste Indikator für die globale Erwärmung des Zwischenstaatlichen Ausschusses für Klimawandel (IPCC) der Vereinten Nationen „wissenschaftlich unhaltbar“ ist The post Eine bahnbrechende neue Studie stellt die Grundlagen von Klimawandel-Bewertungen infrage und deckt gravierende Mängel bei der Messung des Wärmeinhalts der Ozeane auf appeared first on Clintel.

By |17 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Clintel President Václav Klaus warns: “No radical change in Europe in the near future”

We must not be naïve optimists about climate policy and should not overestimate the recent positive signals, like those from President Trump. This is the view of Clintel President Václav Klaus: “Nothing has changed in the European Union. We, with a background in the social sciences, cannot imagine that any radical change will take place in Europe in the near future.” Klaus made these remarks in his speech at the annual meeting of the Norwegian Klimarealistene in Oslo on March 15. The post Clintel President Václav Klaus warns: “No radical change in Europe in the near future” appeared first on Clintel.

By |17 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Une nouvelle étude révolutionnaire remet en cause les fondements des évaluations du changement climatique, révélant des failles fatales dans les mesures du contenu thermique des océans

Une équipe internationale démontre que le principal indicateur du réchauffement climatique utilisé par le Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'évolution du climat (GIEC) des Nations Unies est « scientifiquement non valable ». The post Une nouvelle étude révolutionnaire remet en cause les fondements des évaluations du changement climatique, révélant des failles fatales dans les mesures du contenu thermique des océans appeared first on Clintel.

By |17 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

New study finds low CO2-sensitivity again

A new paper by Frank Stefani compares solar variability and CO₂ emissions as drivers of global sea surface temperatures. Using the solar aa geomagnetic index alongside CO₂ data, the study estimates a transient climate response (TCR) of about 1.1–1.4 K, near the lower end of the IPCC range. The results align closely with other observation-based estimates and highlight the continuing scientific debate about the relative roles of solar activity and greenhouse gases in recent climate change. The post New study finds low CO2-sensitivity again appeared first on Clintel.

By |16 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Clintel Ambassador Ian Plimer on popular Triggernometry podcast: “Climate science is the biggest cult in scientific history”

Clintel-ambassador for Australia, prof. Ian Plimer, didn’t hold back in his recent interview on the popular Triggernometry podcast: “There’s a very large body of people out there who are actually using science to promote scams. It’s absolutely crippling Western countries. You can’t run an industrial society on sea breezes and sunbeams.” The post Clintel Ambassador Ian Plimer on popular Triggernometry podcast: “Climate science is the biggest cult in scientific history” appeared first on Clintel.

By |13 March 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Go to Top