Let’s End The Climate Change Narrative Fraud

Let’s End The Climate Change Narrative Fraud2026-02-18T09:51:50-08:00

Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in.  This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In the future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

Download Climate Change Apps & Share The Real Science on Climate Change Not Funded By Governments & Propagandists.  The apps are free.

For Iphone

Larry Fink the founder of Google is one of the globalists, pushing for world dominance pushing the climate change narrative that has removed the app from the Google play store.  However, you can still download the app here, and just choose to allow your android device to allow apps from unidentified publishers.  There is no malicious files in this app, only 60 slides that sum up the whole climate change narrative lie.  You will get warnings on it not being safe, but this is normal for any app downloaded from outside the play store, in which information like this is being censored.

For Android

Conveniently, once you have downloaded the app, share the individual slides to your favourite social media device.

There is no climate emergency

A global network of over 1900 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Warming is far slower than predicted

The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with COis beneficial.

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters

There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.

Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment.

Epilogue

The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world*. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change.

From now onward the group is going to function as “Global Climate Intelligence Group”. The CLINTEL Group will give solicited and unsolicited advice on climate change and energy transition to governments and companies worldwide.

It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts

World Climate Declaration plus all signatories in pdf

World Climate Declaration AMBASSADORS

NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR JOHN F. CLAUSER / USA
PROFESSOR GUUS BERKHOUT / THE NETHERLANDS
DR. CORNELIS LE PAIR / THE NETHERLANDS
PROFESSOR REYNALD DU BERGER / FRENCH SPEAKING CANADA
BARRY BRILL / NEW ZEALAND
DR. PATRICK MOORE / ENGLISH SPEAKING CANADA
JENS MORTON HANSEN / DENMARK
PROFESSOR LÁSZIÓ SZARKA / HUNGARY
PROFESSOR SEOK SOON PARK / SOUTH KOREA
PROFESSOR JAN-ERIK SOLHEIM / NORWAY
DR. G.-FIVOS SARGENTIS / GREECE
FERDINAND MEEUS / DUTCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR RICHARD LINDZEN / USA
HENRI A. MASSON / FRENCH SPEAKING BELGIUM
PROFESSOR INGEMAR NORDIN / SWEDEN
JIM O’BRIEN / REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
PROFESSOR IAN PLIMER / AUSTRALIA
DOUGLAS POLLOCK / CHILE
DR. PETER STALLINGA / PORTUGAL
DR. BLANCA PARGA LANDA / SPAIN
PROFESSOR ALBERTO PRESTININZI / ITALY
PROFESSOR BENOÎT RITTAUD / FRANCE
DR. THIAGO MAIA / BRAZIL
PROFESSOR FRITZ VAHRENHOLT / GERMANY
THE VISCOUNT MONCKTON OF BRENCHLEY / UNITED KINGDOM
DUŠAN BIŽIĆ / CROATIA, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, SERBIA AND MONTE NEGRO

In addition to these ambassadors, there are over 1900 scientists that have joined our organization and declare that there is no climate change emergency, and instead this is a paid and funded narrative by governments over the world looking to implement green policies to fatten their wallets, and control the populations.   Be free people.  You can care about the planet, live green, reduce population, but undestand one thing.  Humans are not causing the climate to change.   Now if you want to advocate for better polution policies, your governments are all guilty of incompetence, corruption, and bias bought and paid for by their corporate lobbyists.  Yes we can do better on taking care of our planet, but nothing we are doing, is causing climate change, and CO2 has been shown in history to be 5 times the level it is right now, and the planet was flourishing. CO2 is the food for all life on our planet.

Read Our Posts to Learn More

Déclin mondial de la propagande médiatique climatique

L'année dernière a connu une baisse mondiale de 14 % des articles liés au climat par rapport à 2024, qui était déjà en baisse de 38 % par rapport au pic de l'hystérie autour de Greta en 2021. The post Déclin mondial de la propagande médiatique climatique appeared first on Clintel.

By |17 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Continuing Slump in Global Media Climate Agitprop

Last year saw a 14% global slump in climate-related stories compared to 2024, which was already 38% down on peak Greta hysteria in 2021. The post Continuing Slump in Global Media Climate Agitprop appeared first on Clintel.

By |16 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

No, BBC, las pérdidas por desastres no pueden vincularse al cambio climático

Presentar resultados de modelos de billones de dólares como si fueran hechos económicos comprobados es mal periodismo, y la BBC debería avergonzarse por presentar como hechos este tipo de basura fácilmente refutable. Ese es el verdadero desastre aquí. The post No, BBC, las pérdidas por desastres no pueden vincularse al cambio climático appeared first on Clintel.

By |16 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

L’équipe CERES à l’ICCC16 du Heartland Institute : Des voix fortes pour le réalisme climatique

L'équipe du CERES a présenté de nouvelles analyses lors de la conférence Heartland et remettent en question des hypothèses et des modèles clés en climatologie. Leurs interventions ont interrogé le déséquilibre énergétique de la Terre, critiqué les méthodologies du GIEC et souligné la nécessité d'une recherche indépendante et fondée sur des données probantes. The post L’équipe CERES à l’ICCC16 du Heartland Institute : Des voix fortes pour le réalisme climatique appeared first on Clintel.

By |16 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

John Clauser à la conférence Heartland : où sont les preuves ?

Le lauréat du prix Nobel John Clauser était l'un des orateurs de la Conférence internationale sur le changement climatique de la semaine dernière. Clauser affirme qu'il n'existe aucune preuve d'une crise climatique. Il est un signataire éminent de la Déclaration mondiale sur le climat de Clintel. The post John Clauser à la conférence Heartland : où sont les preuves ? appeared first on Clintel.

By |16 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

CERES Team at Heartland Institute’s ICCC16: Bold Voices for Climate Realism

The CERES team presented new analyses at the Heartland Conference challenging key assumptions in climate science. Their talks questioned the Earth’s energy imbalance, criticized IPCC methodologies, and emphasized the need for independent, data-driven research. The post CERES Team at Heartland Institute’s ICCC16: Bold Voices for Climate Realism appeared first on Clintel.

By |15 April 2026|Categories: Climate Change|0 Comments

Go to Top